Critically Appraising and Applying the Evidence

#notstarted

ST 1.1.1

The role and limitations of evidence-based medicine as it applies to emergency medicine practice.

ST 1.1.2

Locate academic medical information in an educational environment.

ST 1.1.3

Locate written and electronic medical information in the workplace to inform emergency medicine practice.

ST 1.1.4

Locate, integrate and modify as required local and regional guidelines to patient care plans for emergency medicine presentations.

ST 1.1.5

Integrate academic reading with sentinel workplace events to improve their emergency medicine practice.

ST 1.2.1

Select appropriate medical information that could inform emergency medicine practice.

ST 1.2.2

Critically appraise the evidence that informed published standards, guidelines, or core clinical protocols for applicability to local emergency medicine practice.

ST 1.2.3

Critically appraise a published article with quantitative and qualitative data to address a clinical question, with the support of a template.

ST 1.2.4

Assess the validity of a study, taking into consideration potential confounders and biases.

ST 1.2.5

Assess the significance of the results of a study, taking into account its magnitude and applicability to patients under consideration.

ST 1.2.6

Describe the role of publication bias in influencing literature published in the emergency medicine context.

ST 1.2.7

Modify the application of standard clinical guidelines to a patient's presentation, with the aid of senior medical staff.

ST 1.3.1

Clinical relevance of a published article as applied to emergency medicine practice.

ST 1.3.2

Design concepts which enhance or detract from the relevance of published literature as applied to emergency medicine.

ST 1.3.3

Independently search for information to perform a limited literature review to define and justify standards of clinical practice.

ST 1.3.4

Locate appropriate published literature to support clinical decisions.

ST 1.3.5

Evaluate quoted quantitative statistical results to validate findings in a published clinical article.

ST 1.3.6

Critically appraise, without the use of a template, a published article with quantitative data.

ST 1.3.7

Critically appraise and compare clinical guidelines in the context of emergency medicine.

ST 1.3.8

Modify application of standard clinical guidelines after incorporating critically appraised, newly published research and according to the patient's presentation.

ST 1.3.9

Evaluate a broad range of academic reading, including newly published research, to improve their emergency medicine practice with the aid of senior medical staff.

ST 1.3.10

Highlight deficiencies in research study results that suggest further scholarly enquiry is warranted.

ST 1.4.1

Regularly search for a range of literature relevant to emergency medicine.

ST 1.4.2

Review the results acquired from a literature review for effectiveness and relevance in local emergency medicine practice.

ST 1.4.3

Critically appraise a published article with qualitative data, with the use of a template, by assessing the validity of a study, potential confounders and biases

ST 1.4.4

Critically appraise the evidence that informed a published standard or guideline for applicability to local emergency medicine practice.

ST 1.4.5

Combine critically appraised literature and local expert practice to amend a local clinical guideline or protocol.

ST 1.4.6

Participate in the evaluation and revision of clinical protocols and guidelines as applied to emergency medicine practice.

ST 1.4.7

Systematically integrate broad academic reading with self-reflection to improve their emergency medicine practice.